Archive for Reframe

Jan
17

The Mind Capacities

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

Have you ever taken a test, or assess­ment to dis­cover who you are, what job best suits you, or which rela­tion­ships fit you best? Do you know your “type”?

Think­ing Styles.

Too many mod­ern assess­ments and mod­els put peo­ple in boxes: you’re an A-type, where you hang in the 4 quad­rants, mod­els of per­son­al­ity etc… As much as it is use­ful to dis­cover cer­tain char­ac­ter traits, those tend to limit us rather than assist us to expand our per­cep­tion of who we are and how we are “sup­posed” to behave, because they tend to func­tion deduc­tively (from out­side to inside) rather than induc­tively (from inside to outside).

Read More→

Categories : Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
Jan
07

Reframing, Easy But Powerful

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

One of the first NLP tech­niques that I teach in our cor­po­rate train­ings is a tech­nique called ‘REFRAMING’. Although easy to per­form, it is a very, I mean VERY pow­er­ful tech­nique. So pow­er­ful in fact, that some­times, it is the only tech­nique needed to change a behav­iour of even a belief.

What is a “reframe” and when is it useful?
The process of chang­ing the con­text of a state­ment to give it another meaning.
This is use­ful in answer­ing objec­tions raised by a prospect in a sales interview.
What is the dif­fer­ence between “Con­texts” and “Con­tent” reframe?
Con­text Refram­ing is giv­ing another mean­ing to a state­ment by chang­ing the context.
Con­tent Refram­ing is giv­ing another mean­ing to a state­ment by recov­er­ing more con­tent, which changes the focus. It is also called Mean­ing Reframe.

What is a “reframe” and when is it use­ful?
Refram­ing sim­ply refers to some­thing we do all the time: the process of chang­ing the mean­ing of a state­ment or sit­u­a­tion.
How is this use­ful?
Read More→

Categories : Reframe
Comments (0)

Alfred Korzyb­ski in “Sci­ence and San­ity” (1933) reflects on the verb “to be” and the process of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. He used to train peo­ple to avoid say­ing “I am”, ask­ing them “Is this all you think you are?”.

Have you noticed when we are asked “who are you”, often, we say our name, and maybe men­tion our occupation/job title? Is this all we are? The verb TO BE can be lim­it­ing and reflects our beliefs about ourselves.

His work was based on the view that human beings are lim­ited in their knowl­edge by the struc­ture of their per­cep­tions and their lan­guage. Unable to expe­ri­ence the world directly, they resort to “abstrac­tions” (non-verbal per­ceived impres­sions and ver­bal indi­ca­tors expressed through lan­guage). The struc­ture of our per­cep­tions and our lan­guage (which deter­mine our under­stand­ing) some­times mis­leads us as to what is going on, what we must deal with. We cre­ate an abstrac­tion and this is the real­ity we deal with. He called for an increased aware­ness in each of us of that process of abstraction.

Inter­est­ingly enough, some 800 years before Korzyb­ski, in India, Shankaracharya, the cre­ator of the phi­los­o­phy of non-duality Advaita Vedanta, men­tioned the human process of “Adhyasa”, super­im­po­si­tion of mean­ing onto the unchang­ing real­ity through our senses, and its rem­edy, “Apavada” decon­struc­tion of the oper­a­tion of the senses.

Expand­ing the struc­ture of our lan­guage and our per­cep­tions, we can truly achieve mind-bloggling results!

Mind-Changing Courses.
Print This Post Print This Post

Categories : Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
Sep
21

Using Language To Change Minds

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

Alfred Korzyb­ski in “Sci­ence and San­ity” (1933) reflects on the verb “to be” and the process of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. He used to train peo­ple to avoid say­ing “I am”, ask­ing them “Is this all you think you are?”.

Have you noticed when we are asked “who are you”, often, we say our name, and maybe men­tion our occupation/job title? Is this all we are? The verb TO BE can be lim­it­ing and reflects our beliefs about ourselves.

His work was based on the view that human beings are lim­ited in their knowl­edge by the struc­ture of their per­cep­tions and their lan­guage. Unable to expe­ri­ence the world directly, they resort to “abstrac­tions” (non-verbal per­ceived impres­sions and ver­bal indi­ca­tors expressed through lan­guage). The struc­ture of our per­cep­tions and our lan­guage (which deter­mine our under­stand­ing) some­times mis­leads us as to what is going on, what we must deal with. We cre­ate an abstrac­tion and this is the real­ity we deal with. He called for an increased aware­ness in each of us of that process of abstraction.

Inter­est­ingly enough, some 800 years before Korzyb­ski, in India, Shankaracharya, the cre­ator of the phi­los­o­phy of non-duality Advaita Vedanta, men­tioned the human process of “Adhyasa”, super­im­po­si­tion of mean­ing onto the unchang­ing real­ity through our senses, and its rem­edy, “Apavada” decon­struc­tion of the oper­a­tion of the senses.

Expand­ing the struc­ture of our lan­guage and our per­cep­tions, we can truly achieve mind-bloggling results! In coach­ing, con­scious use of lan­guage assist clients to expand their model of the world, and con­se­quently, solve their problems.

Click here to learn how.

Categories : Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
Jul
05

One Key To Success and Happiness

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

One of the most cru­cial skills for suc­cess and hap­pi­ness is the abil­ity to change our per­spec­tive on cir­cum­stances, peo­ple, sit­u­a­tions, behav­iours etc…

The tech­ni­cal term for this is “refram­ing”.

Read More→

Categories : Business, Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
UA-5836559