Archive for Language

Words are just ways to express what’s in our mind. Right? Well, maybe not quite so.

In a NY Times arti­cle titled “Does Your Lan­guage Shape How You Think?”, Lin­guist Guy Deutscher con­tends that our mother tongue in fact, trains our brain to think a cer­tain way, and even alters our per­cep­tion of reality.

Take words gen­der for exam­ple. While Eng­lish speak­ers can equiv­o­cally evoke meet­ing a ‘neigh­bour’ for lunch or din­ner with­out men­tion­ing their sex, French or Ger­man speak­ers do not have this flex­i­bil­ity. Whether they like it or not, they will have to reveal the sex of their din­ing companion.

It gets even more sub­tle when you con­sider that many Euro­pean lan­guages assign gen­ders on words refer­ring to inan­i­mate objects. As a native French speaker who has spent the past 20 years in a Chi­nese & Eng­lish speak­ing envi­ron­ment, I can relate to how lan­guage shapes our real­ity. After 20 years of using mostly Eng­lish as my main lan­guage, I still can’t shake off the deep and unex­plain­able feel­ing that the water in my glass is fem­i­nine and my bed is mas­cu­line. And my Chi­nese or Eng­lish speak­ing friends just can­not under­stand how my mobile phone and my uncon­scious mind (this is get­ting weird!) are mas­cu­line, but I vis­cer­ally know that they are.

Read More→

Categories : Communication
Comments (0)
Jul
26

Hypnotic Language Patterns

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

We’ve just posted an arti­cle on Erick­son­ian Hyp­notic pat­terns on the Mas­ter­Minds NLP Tuto­r­ial pub­lic blog.

Click here (or copy and paste http://www.mastermindsnlptutorials.com in your browser).

Categories : Coaching, Hypnosis
Comments (0)

Alfred Korzyb­ski in “Sci­ence and San­ity” (1933) reflects on the verb “to be” and the process of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. He used to train peo­ple to avoid say­ing “I am”, ask­ing them “Is this all you think you are?”.

Have you noticed when we are asked “who are you”, often, we say our name, and maybe men­tion our occupation/job title? Is this all we are? The verb TO BE can be lim­it­ing and reflects our beliefs about ourselves.

His work was based on the view that human beings are lim­ited in their knowl­edge by the struc­ture of their per­cep­tions and their lan­guage. Unable to expe­ri­ence the world directly, they resort to “abstrac­tions” (non-verbal per­ceived impres­sions and ver­bal indi­ca­tors expressed through lan­guage). The struc­ture of our per­cep­tions and our lan­guage (which deter­mine our under­stand­ing) some­times mis­leads us as to what is going on, what we must deal with. We cre­ate an abstrac­tion and this is the real­ity we deal with. He called for an increased aware­ness in each of us of that process of abstraction.

Inter­est­ingly enough, some 800 years before Korzyb­ski, in India, Shankaracharya, the cre­ator of the phi­los­o­phy of non-duality Advaita Vedanta, men­tioned the human process of “Adhyasa”, super­im­po­si­tion of mean­ing onto the unchang­ing real­ity through our senses, and its rem­edy, “Apavada” decon­struc­tion of the oper­a­tion of the senses.

Expand­ing the struc­ture of our lan­guage and our per­cep­tions, we can truly achieve mind-bloggling results!

Mind-Changing Courses.
Print This Post Print This Post

Categories : Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
Sep
21

Using Language To Change Minds

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

Alfred Korzyb­ski in “Sci­ence and San­ity” (1933) reflects on the verb “to be” and the process of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. He used to train peo­ple to avoid say­ing “I am”, ask­ing them “Is this all you think you are?”.

Have you noticed when we are asked “who are you”, often, we say our name, and maybe men­tion our occupation/job title? Is this all we are? The verb TO BE can be lim­it­ing and reflects our beliefs about ourselves.

His work was based on the view that human beings are lim­ited in their knowl­edge by the struc­ture of their per­cep­tions and their lan­guage. Unable to expe­ri­ence the world directly, they resort to “abstrac­tions” (non-verbal per­ceived impres­sions and ver­bal indi­ca­tors expressed through lan­guage). The struc­ture of our per­cep­tions and our lan­guage (which deter­mine our under­stand­ing) some­times mis­leads us as to what is going on, what we must deal with. We cre­ate an abstrac­tion and this is the real­ity we deal with. He called for an increased aware­ness in each of us of that process of abstraction.

Inter­est­ingly enough, some 800 years before Korzyb­ski, in India, Shankaracharya, the cre­ator of the phi­los­o­phy of non-duality Advaita Vedanta, men­tioned the human process of “Adhyasa”, super­im­po­si­tion of mean­ing onto the unchang­ing real­ity through our senses, and its rem­edy, “Apavada” decon­struc­tion of the oper­a­tion of the senses.

Expand­ing the struc­ture of our lan­guage and our per­cep­tions, we can truly achieve mind-bloggling results! In coach­ing, con­scious use of lan­guage assist clients to expand their model of the world, and con­se­quently, solve their problems.

Click here to learn how.

Categories : Coaching, Reframe
Comments (0)
Mar
02

Belief Change

Posted by: admin | Comments (4)

Beliefs are prime exam­ples of gen­er­al­i­sa­tions about our­selves AND the world, which act as a spring board to all our deci­sions. Beliefs are JUST IDEAS, there is noth­ing intrin­si­cally TRUE about them.

One of the most pow­er­ful char­ac­ter of beliefs is that they often become self-fulfilling prophe­cies.

A com­mon exam­ple of this is when a per­son firmly believes they’ve lost some­thing, and sure enough, they can’t find it until some­one points out that the lost object is right in front of them!

Read More→

Categories : How To, NLP
Comments (4)
UA-5836559